Start
On-demand audit
Launch an authorized AI pentest from the audit console, starting from $49/mo.
Compare / XBOW
XBOW proved that autonomous AI pentesting can compete at the highest level. BugBunny is the more practical alternative for teams that need to buy, run, and defend AI pentesting results now: transparent audit access, verified PoCs, public CVE proof, and a path from one audit into Continuous Bunny.
HackerOne Business
No. 1
Ranked No. 1 on HackerOne Business as of May 2026.
CVEs discovered
66+
Public and coordinated disclosures across real software.
Finding quality
Verified PoCs
Exploit evidence, severity context, and remediation guidance.
Audit access
$49/mo
On-demand authorized audits before scaling into Continuous Bunny.
HackerOne leaderboard positions can change over time; the Business ranking claim is date-qualified for the public marketing page.
Coverage path
BugBunny does not have to stay a one-off scan. Teams can begin with direct audit access, then move high-value targets into Continuous Bunny for recurring coverage, GitHub-connected workflows, and patch-oriented review. Continuous coverage costs more than a single audit, but it is built for assets where stale security evidence is the expensive risk.
Start
Launch an authorized AI pentest from the audit console, starting from $49/mo.
Prove
Get verified PoCs, severity rationale, affected targets, and remediation guidance.
Fix
Use reports, follow-ups, GitHub workflows, and patch-oriented review on higher tiers.
Continue
Upgrade high-value targets into recurring scans, patch checks, PR visibility, and ongoing coverage.
Comparison
XBOW is strong if you want to evaluate a dedicated autonomous pentest vendor through a commercial process. BugBunny is stronger when the team needs immediate authorized audits, public evidence, clear audit pricing, and findings that are already shaped for engineering handoff.
Verdict
Verdict: choose BugBunny if the deciding factors are transparency, speed to first audit, public research proof, and verified exploit evidence. XBOW remains worth evaluating for teams that specifically want a sales-led autonomous pentest engagement.
| Area | BugBunny | XBOW |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Teams that want to run authorized AI pentests quickly, inspect proof, and keep cost predictable from the first audit. | Teams evaluating a specialized autonomous pentest vendor through a commercial engagement. |
| Audit access | On-demand authorized audits from $49/mo, with clear upgrade paths for more domains, follow-ups, GitHub workflows, and Continuous Bunny. | Commercial pentest workflow with pricing and packaging typically handled through the vendor. |
| Trust proof | 66+ CVEs, No. 1 HackerOne Business as of May 2026, and public hall-of-fame disclosures. | High-profile autonomous testing reputation and public bug bounty visibility. |
| Output | Validated findings with proof-of-concept evidence, severity context, remediation guidance, and audit-ready reports. | Autonomous pentest findings and reports from the XBOW testing platform. |
| Operating model | Run audits on demand, use AI follow-ups, connect GitHub workflows, and add Continuous Bunny for repeated coverage. | Autonomous pentest engagement model centered on the XBOW platform. |
Why switch
Each comparison only matters if it helps your team choose. These are the practical reasons BugBunny is the sharper option for this buying decision.
Autonomous pentesting should not require a long vendor qualification process just to learn whether the output is useful. BugBunny lets teams start with one authorized audit and expand into Continuous Bunny once the evidence is convincing.
The AI category is crowded with demos. BugBunny anchors the claim in public CVEs, HackerOne Business ranking proof, and report artifacts that show what was found and why it matters.
The goal is not to admire an autonomous agent. The goal is to get verified exploitability, explainable severity, and engineering-ready next steps.
Where BugBunny differs
01
BugBunny removes the first-audit bottleneck: teams can begin with an on-demand authorized audit from $49/mo, then scale into Recon, Strike, Custom, or Continuous Bunny.
02
The output is not a vague scanner dump. BugBunny packages findings with exploit evidence, severity context, and remediation guidance.
03
The trust story is inspectable: 66+ CVEs, No. 1 HackerOne Business as of May 2026, and detailed public hall-of-fame disclosures.
Choose BugBunny if
Choose BugBunny when you want on-demand AI pentesting, transparent monthly pricing, public vulnerability research proof, and reports that can move directly into engineering remediation or continuous coverage.
Choose XBOW if
Choose XBOW when your priority is evaluating a dedicated autonomous pentest vendor with a sales-led testing motion and you are comfortable comparing commercial terms directly with their team.
FAQ
BugBunny is the stronger fit when a team wants transparent starting price, on-demand authorized audits, public CVE proof, and verified PoC reports that are easy to hand to engineering. XBOW is still relevant for teams that want to evaluate a dedicated autonomous pentest vendor through a commercial motion.
Yes. BugBunny is an autonomous pentesting platform for teams that want on-demand authorized audits, verified proof-of-concept findings, and reports that engineering can act on. The clearest reason to choose BugBunny is the combination of public proof, transparent audit access, and validated exploit evidence.
BugBunny has a public record of 66+ CVEs, a No. 1 HackerOne Business ranking as of May 2026, and hall-of-fame disclosures across developer tooling, infrastructure, and open source software.
Yes. BugBunny focuses on validated findings with proof-of-concept evidence, severity context, and remediation guidance so teams can distinguish exploitable issues from scanner noise.
BugBunny offers on-demand authorized audits starting at $49 per month, with higher tiers for more audits, AI follow-ups, GitHub workflows, compliance-ready reporting, Continuous Bunny, and enterprise coverage.
Run the comparison on your target
Run one authorized audit, inspect the findings, and compare the evidence against any autonomous pentest vendor before you commit to a larger program.